next up previous contents
Next: Comparison between GRBM and Up: Comparison with CGRO/BATSE results Previous: The BATSE experiment and

Simultaneous detection of GRBM and BATSE

A cross check between BATSE and GRBM detections of GRB has been made. A deep study carried out over about one year has given the results listed in Tab. 4.11.2, from Preger et al. 1999, where with "Hardware OFF" we indicate that the instrument is switched off, and this can occur for example during the passage of the satellite over the South Atlantic Geomagnetic Anomaly, or in case of satellite maintenance. With "Software OFF", instead, we indicate that the instrument is on, but the software is not enabled: data are stored and can be analyzed, but the trigger function is inactive. A particular care was devoted to the study of possible selection effects on the GRBM trigger efficiency, showing a clear selection on duration (only 2 events shorter than 1 s), a partial correlation between intensity and incoming direction (weaker events are preferably triggered at directions close to the satellite's equatorial plane). The angular distribution of these GRBs in the satellite rest frame reveals the pair of detectors GRBM2 and GRBM3 as the most efficient in triggering GRBs (we remind here that a valid GRB is recognized when at least 2 detectors trigger on the same event).


 
Table 4.2: BATSE/GRBM relative trigger efficiency from May, 23th 1997 to June, 6th 1998 (from Preger et al. 1999).
Number of days 374
BATSE triggers 322
GRBM simultaneous triggers 61
GRBM hardware OFF 119
GRBM software OFF 3
Detected but not triggered 24
Data not available 11
Common triggers 32%
Common detections 46%


next up previous contents
Next: Comparison between GRBM and Up: Comparison with CGRO/BATSE results Previous: The BATSE experiment and
Lorenzo Amati
8/30/1999